top of page
Writer's pictureShalena

The Growing Attack on Bloggers and YouTubers: Silencing the Unfiltered Truth

Updated: Dec 28, 2024



It's pretty plain to see social media platforms dominate public discourse, bloggers and YouTubers have emerged as influential voices, often offering raw, unfiltered takes on issues that mainstream media might sidestep. However, with this newfound influence comes an increasing wave of backlash. Celebrities and public figures are taking legal action to silence these creators, sparking debates around freedom of speech and journalistic integrity. High-profile cases like those involving Tasha K, Milagro Gramz, and Candace Owens illustrate the tension between public figures seeking to protect their reputations and the rights of creators to share their opinions.


The Case of Tasha K and Cardi B

Tasha K, a well-known YouTuber and blogger, became embroiled in a landmark legal battle with rapper Cardi B. The case revolved around allegations made by Tasha K on her platform, where she claimed that Cardi B engaged in illicit activities and had health issues. Cardi B sued for defamation, arguing that these claims were false and damaging to her reputation.

In 2022, the court ruled in Cardi B's favor, awarding her nearly $4 million in damages. The case sent shockwaves through the blogging community, as it highlighted the potential legal risks of sharing sensational stories about public figures. While some saw the ruling as a necessary measure to curb misinformation, others viewed it as a chilling precedent that could stifle free speech.


Milagro Gramz and the Megan Thee Stallion-Tory Lanez Trial

Milagro Gramz, a social media commentator, gained traction for her coverage of the highly publicized trial involving Megan Thee Stallion and Tory Lanez. Known for her unfiltered and sometimes controversial takes, Milagro provided commentary that often challenged mainstream narratives.

Megan Thee Stallion’s legal team and supporters accused Milagro of bias and spreading misinformation, sparking debates about the role of independent commentators in legal proceedings. While Milagro faced public criticism and threats of legal action, her supporters and the majority of the public argued that she was exercising her right to free speech, raising questions about whether bloggers can provide alternative perspectives without fear of retaliation.


Candace Owens vs. Kim Kardashian

Candace Owens, a conservative commentator and YouTuber, has also faced legal threats for her outspoken views. In one notable instance, Owens criticized Kim Kardashian and accused her of promoting morally questionable behavior. Kardashian reportedly considered legal action, citing defamation. While no lawsuit was ultimately filed, the threat underscored the precarious position of creators who comment on high-profile individuals. Owens, like many others, stood firm, arguing that her critiques were protected under free speech.


The Fine Line Between Defamation and Free Speech

These cases reveal a contentious battle over the boundaries of free speech. Public figures argue that bloggers and YouTubers have a responsibility to fact-check their content and avoid spreading harmful misinformation. On the other hand, creators assert that their platforms are outlets for opinions and commentary, which should be protected under the First Amendment.


The defamation standard for public figures in the United States is notoriously high, requiring proof that the statements were made with "actual malice"—knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard for the truth. This legal threshold is meant to protect free expression, yet the financial and emotional toll of a lawsuit can be devastating for independent creators.

The Broader Implications


The attacks on bloggers and YouTubers highlight a broader issue: the democratization of media. Traditional gatekeepers no longer control the narrative, and this shift has unsettled many public figures. While legal action can be a legitimate recourse for those who have been genuinely defamed, it can also be and seems to be use to weaponize to silence dissenting voices in some case as of late! Especially those where the celebrities actually SHARE THE INFORMATION THEMSELVES!


The rise of creators like Tasha K, Milagro Gramz, and Candace Owens reflects a growing demand for alternative media, where unfiltered truths and controversial takes find an audience. However, as these creators gain influence, they also face increasing scrutiny and pushback, underscoring the delicate balance between accountability and freedom of expression.


The legal battles faced by bloggers and YouTubers are a reminder of the fragile state of free speech. While public figures have a right to protect their reputations, the courts must be careful not to set precedents that could stifle independent journalism and commentary. The cases of Tasha K, Milagro Gramz, and Candace Owens illustrate the power of these creators to shape public discourse—and the lengths to which some will go to silence them.


Several bloggers, YouTubers, and social media commentators have faced legal action over the years. These cases often revolve around issues of defamation, copyright infringement, or privacy violations and it has to stop!


Below are some MORE notable instances:


1. Perez Hilton

Case: Defamation lawsuits from celebritiesPerez Hilton, one of the earliest celebrity gossip bloggers, frequently found himself at the center of lawsuits for his bold claims about public figures. While many of these lawsuits were settled out of court, Hilton was often accused of spreading false information or invading celebrities' privacy.

Key Example: In 2007, Hilton faced a lawsuit from Universal Music Group for using copyrighted images and videos without permission. While not a defamation case, it highlighted the legal risks bloggers face when reporting on celebrity culture.


2. Nick Sandmann vs. Multiple Media Outlets

Case: Defamation lawsuit against bloggers and media outletsIn 2019, Nick Sandmann, a high school student, filed lawsuits against multiple media outlets and independent commentators, including some bloggers, for their portrayal of an incident at the Lincoln Memorial. While Sandmann was primarily targeting mainstream media, the lawsuits extended to individual creators who contributed to the narrative.

Outcome: Some cases were dismissed, but settlements were reached with major outlets like CNN and The Washington Post.


3. Keemstar (Daniel Keem)

Case: Defamation accusations by multiple YouTubersKeemstar, the creator of the YouTube channel DramaAlert, has been sued or threatened with lawsuits multiple times. Known for his controversial commentary on internet drama, Keemstar has faced legal threats for making unverified claims about fellow YouTubers.

Key Example: In 2016, Keemstar was accused of falsely labeling a man as a pedophile, which led to significant backlash and the threat of legal action. While the case didn’t go to court, it highlighted the dangers of making unverified claims in commentary.


4. The Shade Room

Case: Defamation lawsuits from celebritiesThe Shade Room, a popular gossip blog focusing on Black culture and entertainment, has faced multiple legal threats from celebrities.Key Example: In 2020, Ari Fletcher, a model and influencer, threatened to sue The Shade Room for allegedly posting false and defamatory content about her personal life. While the case didn't go to court, it highlighted the friction between gossip blogs and public figures.



6. Natasha Cooper (YouTube: NC-Tube)

Case: Defamation lawsuit by YouTuber Katie Joy PaulsonKatie Joy Paulson, creator of the channel Without a Crystal Ball, filed a defamation lawsuit against Natasha Cooper for allegedly spreading false information. The case became a battleground over online harassment and freedom of speech among YouTubers.


7. Barstool Sports

Case: Multiple defamation lawsuitsBarstool Sports, known for its edgy humor and commentary, has faced numerous lawsuits from public figures and former employees.Key Example: In 2020, former Barstool employee Alexandra Cooper threatened legal action for allegedly false and defamatory claims made about her on the platform.




So as you can see there has been a long history of this legal dance and it's far from over! But we should have the RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH! Especially if celebrities has share the information.


4 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Commentaires


bottom of page